To Kill A Mockingbird More Offensive than Twilight Series and Catcher in the Rye
30 Apr
The year is 2010. And The Guardian has recently reported that Stephenie Meyer has joined the ranks of authors whose books get the most requests to be banned from American libraries. The Twilight series debuts on the baddies books list at fifth, between To Kill a Mockingbird (fourth) and Catcher in the Rye (sixth).
The American Library Association (ALA) didn’t have too much to say on the importance of Twilight to the history of literature, but its rep Angela Maycock did note that Salinger’s iconic novel of teenage rebellion The Catcher in the Rye has been called “anti-white,” “obscene,” “centered around negative activity,” and “a filthy, filthy book”—ever since it was published more than 50 years ago.
Maycock’s final analysis: Noncomformity, even in 2010, is scary.
Barbara Jones, director of the ALA’s office for intellectual freedom adds the following: “[T]he ability to read, speak, think and express ourselves freely are core American values. . . Protecting one of our most fundamental rights—the freedom to read—means respecting each other’s differences and the right of all people to choose for themselves what they and their families read.”
Meanwhile, ASF wonders if the people who are cleansing their libraries and school of dirty and challenging literature have gotten the ink off their hands from their morning paper.
After the the jump, the ALA’s Top Ten Most Frequently Challenged Books of 2009:

Walker Percy brought us The Moviegoer, which took the National Book Award for Fiction in 1962. Nearly 50 years, this March, later Loyola University in New Orleans honors their esteemed colleague by bringing us the 



